![]() ![]() #Stuffit deluxe 2010 for windows review zip#Rather than encode files with resource forks, it places resource fork data in the "extra data" portion of the Zip archive. #Stuffit deluxe 2010 for windows review mac os#It does not store resource fork data in a manner that is compatible with any other Mac OS Zip utilities. It was written for use with MacMAME ROM sets, with a simple drag and drop only interface. Zipper was not tested because it is an oddity. Besides ZipIt's capability of creating self-extracting archives that will work on the Mac OS, I would be surprised if either provided any significant features or performance over those that were tested. ZipIt and NutCase Gzip were not tested because they require the CarbonLib, a bane to all Mac OS 8 users. I may look into this in the future, to verify if there is any significance StuffIt Deluxe has over DropStuff, besides the interface-related features. It uses the same StuffIt Engine as DropStuff, so I assumed there was no need for testing. StuffIt Deluxe was not tested because I believed it unnecessary. It uses the NuFX library and compresses/archives files in the ShrinkIt format standard on the Apple II series, including Apple IIgs. Shrink II was not tested due to misplacement of the program. I neglected to include a few programs, some with a good reason, and some with none. Loyalty and stubbornness could both be considered reasons. My reasons for using DropStuff 5.1.2 instead of a newer version are not necessarily logical. This may, or may not, be a positive aspect, depending on the user.įor what it is worth, I have created "InkBlot's Picks." These are the compressors and compressor/archivers I use most often. Easy-BZ and Easy-GZ are extremely simple, with few options and drag and drop support. MacBzip2 and MacGzip have a fair number of options, and also support Mac OS features, like drag and drop and resource fork retention via MacBinary encoding. While they are true to the originals, they lack in Mac OS support. The MPW Tools, bzip2 and gzip, have almost all the features of the original command-line programs. The only big difference is the number of options provided. ![]() The performance differences between the bzip2 compressors and between the gzip compressors were small, except in the case of the slower MPW Tools. Both of the MPW Tools performed almost as well as the rest of the bzip2 and gzip compressors, but were definitely slower, possibly because of the MPW Shell. It was interesting to see both Easy-BZ and MacBzip2 outperformed DropStuff 5.5 in the sound compression test. The compressors based on the bzip2 format compressed better than those based on the gzip format, but were slower in compressing files. The bzip2 and gzip "applications" are actually MPW Tools, and were tested under MPW Shell 3.5 on the same system as all the other testing. The last group consists of compressors with no archiving capabilities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |